Which statement correctly describes the relationship of the Support Maintenance Company’s organizational placement and attachment options?

Which statement correctly describes the relationship of the Support Maintenance Company’s organizational placement and attachment options?

• A. It is organic to the DSSB and can attach to a CSSB
• B. It provides field maintenance on an area basis to non-divisionally aligned units
• C. It cannot attach to any CSSB
• D. It handles major combat systems without surge teams

Answer: (A)

Placement and attachment flexibility within sustainment units. The Support Maintenance Company is an organic element of the Direct Support Sustainment Battalion, built to provide field maintenance as part of that battalion’s capabilities. Because sustainment forces are designed to flex with mission needs, this company can attach to a Combat Service Support Battalion to support its area or units as required. This arrangement lets maintenance capacity move where it’s most needed without restructuring the entire force, which is exactly what the statement describes. So, the company being organic to the DSSB and able to attach to a CSSB best captures how it’s organized and deployed.

Placement and attachment flexibility within sustainment units.

The Support Maintenance Company is an organic element of the Direct Support Sustainment Battalion, built to provide field maintenance as part of that battalion’s capabilities. Because sustainment forces are designed to flex with mission needs, this company can attach to a Combat Service Support Battalion to support its area or units as required. This arrangement lets maintenance capacity move where it’s most needed without restructuring the entire force, which is exactly what the statement describes.

So, the company being organic to the DSSB and able to attach to a CSSB best captures how it’s organized and deployed.